Suburb comparison
ACACIA CREEK vs BROKEN DAM
BROKEN DAM leads on more metrics (6 vs 2).
| Metric | ACACIA CREEK NSW 2476 | BROKEN DAM NSW 2629 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 72 | 77✓ |
| Liveability score | 33 | 37✓ |
| Median price | $110,000✓ | $368,000 |
| Median rent | $375/wk | $1200/wk |
| Rental yield | 17.7%✓ | 17.0% |
| Annual growth | — | — |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.6%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 848 | 907✓ |
| Safety index | 97 | 100✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 14 | 27✓ |
Full profile: ACACIA CREEK, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: BROKEN DAM, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NSW ✓ and NSW ✓; rents are real for NSW. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.