Suburb comparison
ACACIA HILLS vs AMATA
ACACIA HILLS leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | ACACIA HILLS NT 0822 | AMATA NT 0872 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 59✓ | 44 |
| Liveability score | 32✓ | 20 |
| Median price | $540,000 | $205,000✓ |
| Median rent | $80/wk | $75/wk |
| Rental yield | 0.8% | 1.9%✓ |
| Annual growth | 1.7%✓ | 1.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.4% | 3.0%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 688✓ | 627 |
| Safety index | 53✓ | 20 |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 93✓ | 25 |
Full profile: ACACIA HILLS, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: AMATA, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.