Suburb comparison
AMATA vs BRADSHAW
BRADSHAW leads on more metrics (8 vs 1).
| Metric | AMATA NT 0872 | BRADSHAW NT 0852 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 44 | 47✓ |
| Liveability score | 20 | 22✓ |
| Median price | $205,000 | $190,000✓ |
| Median rent | $75/wk | $80/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.9% | 2.2%✓ |
| Annual growth | 1.0% | 1.2%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 3.0% | 2.5%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 627 | 642✓ |
| Safety index | 20 | 72✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 25✓ | 3 |
Full profile: AMATA, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: BRADSHAW, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.