Suburb comparison
AMATA vs HUGH
HUGH leads on more metrics (4 vs 2).
| Metric | AMATA NT 0872 | HUGH NT 0872 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 44 | 50✓ |
| Liveability score | 20 | 20 |
| Median price | $205,000✓ | $220,000 |
| Median rent | $75/wk | $75/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.9%✓ | 1.8% |
| Annual growth | 1.0% | 1.1%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 3.0% | 2.8%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 627 | 627 |
| Safety index | 20 | 20 |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 25 | 43✓ |
Full profile: AMATA, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: HUGH, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.