Suburb comparison
AMATA vs KILGARIFF
KILGARIFF leads on more metrics (7 vs 1).
| Metric | AMATA NT 0872 | KILGARIFF NT 0873 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 44 | 49✓ |
| Liveability score | 20 | 28✓ |
| Median price | $205,000✓ | $250,000 |
| Median rent | $75/wk | $250/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.9% | 5.2%✓ |
| Annual growth | 1.0% | 1.3%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 3.0% | 2.6%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 627 | 848✓ |
| Safety index | 20 | 71✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 25 | 25 |
Full profile: AMATA, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: KILGARIFF, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.