Suburb comparison
AMATA vs KING ASH BAY
KING ASH BAY leads on more metrics (5 vs 4).
| Metric | AMATA NT 0872 | KING ASH BAY NT 0854 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 44✓ | 43 |
| Liveability score | 20 | 20 |
| Median price | $205,000 | $155,000✓ |
| Median rent | $75/wk | $143/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.9% | 4.8%✓ |
| Annual growth | 1.0%✓ | 0.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.0%✓ | 3.8% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 627 | 665✓ |
| Safety index | 20 | 32✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 13✓ |
| Transit score | 25✓ | 9 |
Full profile: AMATA, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: KING ASH BAY, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.