Suburb comparison
ANULA vs WAGAMAN
WAGAMAN leads on more metrics (4 vs 3).
| Metric | ANULA NT 0812 | WAGAMAN NT 0810 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 54✓ | 53 |
| Liveability score | 44 | 47✓ |
| Median price | $530,000 | $525,000✓ |
| Median rent | $83/wk | $80/wk |
| Rental yield | 3.5%✓ | 3.4% |
| Annual growth | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 2.8%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 904 | 995✓ |
| Safety index | 20 | 20 |
| Walkability | 55✓ | 27 |
| Transit score | 95 | 95 |
Full profile: ANULA, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: WAGAMAN, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.