Suburb comparison
BACK FOREST vs DEEP CREEK
It's close — they're well matched overall.
| Metric | BACK FOREST NSW 2535 | DEEP CREEK NSW 2440 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 50 | 53✓ |
| Liveability score | 52✓ | 43 |
| Median price | $1,412,500 | $520,000✓ |
| Median rent | $610/wk | $460/wk |
| Rental yield | 2.3% | 4.6%✓ |
| Annual growth | -0.9%✓ | -19.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7%✓ | 2.0% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1044✓ | 875 |
| Safety index | 99✓ | 98 |
| Walkability | 0 | 1✓ |
| Transit score | 20 | 37✓ |
Full profile: BACK FOREST, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: DEEP CREEK, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NSW ✓ and NSW ✓; rents are real for NSW. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.