Suburb comparison
BAGDAD vs FLAGSTAFF GULLY
FLAGSTAFF GULLY leads on more metrics (7 vs 2).
| Metric | BAGDAD TAS 7030 | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 56 | 56 |
| Liveability score | 35 | 56✓ |
| Median price | $910,000 | $835,000✓ |
| Median rent | $270/wk | $400/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.5% | 2.5%✓ |
| Annual growth | 3.2%✓ | 3.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 1.7%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 868 | 1017✓ |
| Safety index | 55✓ | 48 |
| Walkability | 0 | 15✓ |
| Transit score | 91 | 95✓ |
Full profile: BAGDAD, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.