Suburb comparison
BLUE ROCKS vs FLAGSTAFF GULLY
FLAGSTAFF GULLY leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | BLUE ROCKS TAS 7255 | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 58✓ | 56 |
| Liveability score | 35 | 56✓ |
| Median price | $440,000✓ | $835,000 |
| Median rent | $140/wk | $400/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.6% | 2.5%✓ |
| Annual growth | 2.7% | 3.0%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 924 | 1017✓ |
| Safety index | 74✓ | 48 |
| Walkability | 0 | 15✓ |
| Transit score | 40 | 95✓ |
Full profile: BLUE ROCKS, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.