Suburb comparison
CANOELANDS vs DEEP CREEK
DEEP CREEK leads on more metrics (6 vs 4).
| Metric | CANOELANDS NSW 2157 | DEEP CREEK NSW 2440 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 52 | 53✓ |
| Liveability score | 66✓ | 43 |
| Median price | $2,422,000 | $520,000✓ |
| Median rent | $850/wk | $460/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.8% | 4.6%✓ |
| Annual growth | -27.7% | -19.6%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4%✓ | 2.0% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1048✓ | 875 |
| Safety index | 92 | 98✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 1✓ |
| Transit score | 93✓ | 37 |
Full profile: CANOELANDS, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: DEEP CREEK, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NSW ✓ and NSW ✓; rents are real for NSW. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.