Suburb comparison
CASEY vs EMU HEIGHTS
It's close — they're well matched overall.
| Metric | CASEY TAS 7151 | EMU HEIGHTS TAS 7320 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 47 | 48✓ |
| Liveability score | 34 | 37✓ |
| Median price | $185,000✓ | $255,000 |
| Median rent | $270/wk | $240/wk |
| Rental yield | 7.6%✓ | 4.9% |
| Annual growth | 1.2% | 1.9%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8%✓ | 2.1% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 925 | 939✓ |
| Safety index | 71 | 80✓ |
| Walkability | 23✓ | 0 |
| Transit score | 15✓ | 6 |
Full profile: CASEY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: EMU HEIGHTS, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.