Suburb comparison
CATAMARAN vs FLAGSTAFF GULLY
FLAGSTAFF GULLY leads on more metrics (8 vs 2).
| Metric | CATAMARAN TAS 7109 | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 53 | 56✓ |
| Liveability score | 45 | 56✓ |
| Median price | $640,000✓ | $835,000 |
| Median rent | $290/wk | $400/wk |
| Rental yield | 2.4% | 2.5%✓ |
| Annual growth | 2.3% | 3.0%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.7%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 937 | 1017✓ |
| Safety index | 59✓ | 48 |
| Walkability | 0 | 15✓ |
| Transit score | 93 | 95✓ |
Full profile: CATAMARAN, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.