Suburb comparison
CHELSEA HEIGHTS vs INKERMAN
CHELSEA HEIGHTS leads on more metrics (6 vs 4).
| Metric | CHELSEA HEIGHTS VIC 3196 | INKERMAN VIC 3472 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 57✓ | 45 |
| Liveability score | 62✓ | 20 |
| Median price | $1,285,500 | $335,000✓ |
| Median rent | $396/wk | $192/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.6% | 3.0%✓ |
| Annual growth | 0.2% | 4.7%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 1.7%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1079✓ | 952 |
| Safety index | 57✓ | 0 |
| Walkability | 43✓ | 0 |
| Transit score | 46✓ | 7 |
Full profile: CHELSEA HEIGHTS, VIC
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: INKERMAN, VIC
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for VIC ✓ and VIC ✓; rents are real for VIC. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.