Suburb comparison
CONDER vs HMAS CRESWELL
CONDER leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | CONDER ACT 2906 | HMAS CRESWELL ACT 2540 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 59✓ | 46 |
| Liveability score | 59✓ | 40 |
| Median price | $1,110,000 | $800,000✓ |
| Median rent | $410/wk | $360/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.9% | 2.3%✓ |
| Annual growth | 3.1%✓ | 1.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1029✓ | 955 |
| Safety index | 62 | 85✓ |
| Walkability | 61✓ | 4 |
| Transit score | 40✓ | 8 |
Full profile: CONDER, ACT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: HMAS CRESWELL, ACT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for ACT (modelled) and ACT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.