Suburb comparison
COTSWOLD HILLS vs LAMINGTON NATIONAL PARK
LAMINGTON NATIONAL PARK leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | COTSWOLD HILLS QLD 4350 | LAMINGTON NATIONAL PARK QLD 4275 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 61 | 62✓ |
| Liveability score | 40 | 48✓ |
| Median price | $565,000✓ | $1,170,000 |
| Median rent | $640/wk | $400/wk |
| Rental yield | 5.9%✓ | 1.8% |
| Annual growth | 7.7% | 9.2%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.4%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 996 | 1012✓ |
| Safety index | 70✓ | 39 |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 26 | 95✓ |
Full profile: COTSWOLD HILLS, QLD
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: LAMINGTON NATIONAL PARK, QLD
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for QLD (modelled) and QLD (modelled); rents are real for QLD. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.