Suburb comparison
CRESCENT vs NALPA
NALPA leads on more metrics (5 vs 3).
| Metric | CRESCENT SA 5341 | NALPA SA 5255 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 56✓ | 51 |
| Liveability score | 39 | 39 |
| Median price | $315,000✓ | $365,000 |
| Median rent | $200/wk | $440/wk |
| Rental yield | 3.3% | 6.3%✓ |
| Annual growth | 6.1% | 7.4%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.0%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 962 | 997✓ |
| Safety index | 98✓ | 65 |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 12 | 16✓ |
Full profile: CRESCENT, SA
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: NALPA, SA
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for SA ✓ and SA ✓; rents are real for SA. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.