Suburb comparison
BIMLOW vs ERSKINE PARK
BIMLOW leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | BIMLOW NSW 2787 | ERSKINE PARK NSW 2759 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 69✓ | 45 |
| Liveability score | 50✓ | 47 |
| Median price | $505,000✓ | $1,235,000 |
| Median rent | $470/wk | $660/wk |
| Rental yield | 4.8%✓ | 2.8% |
| Annual growth | — | -5.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.2%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 946 | 985✓ |
| Safety index | 98✓ | 83 |
| Walkability | 0 | 16✓ |
| Transit score | 76✓ | 13 |
Full profile: BIMLOW, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: ERSKINE PARK, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NSW ✓ and NSW ✓; rents are real for NSW. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.