Suburb comparison
FLAGSTAFF GULLY vs HUNTINGFIELD
HUNTINGFIELD leads on more metrics (6 vs 4).
| Metric | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 | HUNTINGFIELD TAS 7055 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 56✓ | 47 |
| Liveability score | 56 | 59✓ |
| Median price | $835,000 | $690,000✓ |
| Median rent | $400/wk | $415/wk |
| Rental yield | 2.5% | 3.1%✓ |
| Annual growth | 3.0%✓ | 2.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7%✓ | 1.9% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1017 | 1073✓ |
| Safety index | 48 | 52✓ |
| Walkability | 15 | 16✓ |
| Transit score | 95✓ | 66 |
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: HUNTINGFIELD, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.