Suburb comparison
FLAGSTAFF GULLY vs ROSETTA
FLAGSTAFF GULLY leads on more metrics (5 vs 3).
| Metric | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 | ROSETTA TAS 7010 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 56 | 56 |
| Liveability score | 56✓ | 48 |
| Median price | $835,000✓ | $870,000 |
| Median rent | $400/wk | $320/wk |
| Rental yield | 2.5%✓ | 1.9% |
| Annual growth | 3.0% | 3.1%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.4%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1017✓ | 945 |
| Safety index | 48 | 61✓ |
| Walkability | 15✓ | 0 |
| Transit score | 95 | 95 |
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: ROSETTA, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.