Suburb comparison
FLYNN vs TINDAL RAAF
FLYNN leads on more metrics (3 vs 2).
| Metric | FLYNN NT 0875 | TINDAL RAAF NT 0853 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 45 | 45 |
| Liveability score | 20 | 24✓ |
| Median price | — | — |
| Median rent | $328/wk | $260/wk |
| Rental yield | — | — |
| Annual growth | 1.4%✓ | 1.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.3%✓ | 4.4% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 844 | 858✓ |
| Safety index | 45 | 45 |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 9✓ | 3 |
Full profile: FLYNN, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: TINDAL RAAF, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.