Suburb comparison
CASEY vs GLENFERN
CASEY leads on more metrics (7 vs 3).
| Metric | CASEY TAS 7151 | GLENFERN TAS 7140 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 47✓ | 45 |
| Liveability score | 34✓ | 32 |
| Median price | $185,000 | $150,000✓ |
| Median rent | $270/wk | $270/wk |
| Rental yield | 7.6% | 9.4%✓ |
| Annual growth | 1.2%✓ | 0.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8%✓ | 1.9% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 925✓ | 914 |
| Safety index | 71 | 85✓ |
| Walkability | 23✓ | 0 |
| Transit score | 15✓ | 9 |
Full profile: CASEY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: GLENFERN, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.