Suburb comparison
BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS vs KINGS MEADOWS
BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS leads on more metrics (7 vs 3).
| Metric | BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS TAS 7250 | KINGS MEADOWS TAS 7249 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 48✓ | 47 |
| Liveability score | 43✓ | 42 |
| Median price | $245,000✓ | $320,000 |
| Median rent | $66/wk | $69/wk |
| Rental yield | 6.0%✓ | 4.9% |
| Annual growth | 1.4% | 1.9%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.4%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1007✓ | 976 |
| Safety index | 73✓ | 61 |
| Walkability | 0 | 59✓ |
| Transit score | 40✓ | 22 |
Full profile: BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: KINGS MEADOWS, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.