Suburb comparison
CASEY vs KINGS MEADOWS
KINGS MEADOWS leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | CASEY TAS 7151 | KINGS MEADOWS TAS 7249 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 47 | 47 |
| Liveability score | 34 | 42✓ |
| Median price | $185,000✓ | $320,000 |
| Median rent | $270/wk | $300/wk |
| Rental yield | 7.6%✓ | 4.9% |
| Annual growth | 1.2% | 1.9%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.4%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 925 | 976✓ |
| Safety index | 71✓ | 61 |
| Walkability | 23 | 59✓ |
| Transit score | 15 | 22✓ |
Full profile: CASEY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: KINGS MEADOWS, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.