Suburb comparison
BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS vs KINGSTON
KINGSTON leads on more metrics (6 vs 4).
| Metric | BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS TAS 7250 | KINGSTON TAS 7050 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 48 | 49✓ |
| Liveability score | 43 | 64✓ |
| Median price | $245,000✓ | $750,000 |
| Median rent | $66/wk | $88/wk |
| Rental yield | 6.0%✓ | 2.6% |
| Annual growth | 1.4% | 2.7%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6%✓ | 1.7% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1007 | 1037✓ |
| Safety index | 73✓ | 67 |
| Walkability | 0 | 53✓ |
| Transit score | 40 | 67✓ |
Full profile: BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: KINGSTON, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.