Suburb comparison
LATHAM vs MACNAMARA
LATHAM leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | LATHAM ACT 2615 | MACNAMARA ACT 2615 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 58✓ | 56 |
| Liveability score | 53 | 55✓ |
| Median price | $1,125,000✓ | $1,320,000 |
| Median rent | $97/wk | $97/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.9%✓ | 1.6% |
| Annual growth | 3.1% | 3.6%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3%✓ | 1.6% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1040 | 1040 |
| Safety index | 99✓ | 72 |
| Walkability | 15✓ | 0 |
| Transit score | 39 | 67✓ |
Full profile: LATHAM, ACT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: MACNAMARA, ACT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for ACT (modelled) and ACT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.