Suburb comparison
DEEP CREEK vs LUDDENHAM
LUDDENHAM leads on more metrics (7 vs 3).
| Metric | DEEP CREEK NSW 2440 | LUDDENHAM NSW 2745 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 53✓ | 50 |
| Liveability score | 43 | 60✓ |
| Median price | $520,000✓ | $1,250,000 |
| Median rent | $460/wk | $780/wk |
| Rental yield | 4.6%✓ | 3.2% |
| Annual growth | -19.6% | -10.4%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.4%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 875 | 1001✓ |
| Safety index | 98 | 100✓ |
| Walkability | 1 | 2✓ |
| Transit score | 37 | 92✓ |
Full profile: DEEP CREEK, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: LUDDENHAM, NSW
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NSW ✓ and NSW ✓; rents are real for NSW. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.