Suburb comparison
CASEY vs QUAMBY BEND
CASEY leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | CASEY TAS 7151 | QUAMBY BEND TAS 7292 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 47✓ | 45 |
| Liveability score | 34 | 37✓ |
| Median price | $185,000 | $165,000✓ |
| Median rent | $270/wk | $200/wk |
| Rental yield | 7.6%✓ | 6.3% |
| Annual growth | 1.2%✓ | 1.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 925 | 999✓ |
| Safety index | 71✓ | 68 |
| Walkability | 23✓ | 0 |
| Transit score | 15✓ | 11 |
Full profile: CASEY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: QUAMBY BEND, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.