Suburb comparison
ELPHIN vs SCAMANDER
ELPHIN leads on more metrics (5 vs 3).
| Metric | ELPHIN TAS 7250 | SCAMANDER TAS 7215 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 49 | 49 |
| Liveability score | 40✓ | 37 |
| Median price | $285,000 | $205,000✓ |
| Median rent | $66/wk | $58/wk |
| Rental yield | 5.2% | 6.3%✓ |
| Annual growth | 1.7%✓ | 1.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0%✓ | 2.3% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1007✓ | 979 |
| Safety index | 67 | 91✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 22✓ | 0 |
Full profile: ELPHIN, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: SCAMANDER, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.