Suburb comparison
FLAGSTAFF GULLY vs SHANNON
FLAGSTAFF GULLY leads on more metrics (7 vs 2).
| Metric | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 | SHANNON TAS 7030 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 56 | 58✓ |
| Liveability score | 56✓ | 41 |
| Median price | $835,000✓ | $845,000 |
| Median rent | $400/wk | $270/wk |
| Rental yield | 2.5%✓ | 1.7% |
| Annual growth | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7%✓ | 2.3% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1017✓ | 868 |
| Safety index | 48 | 77✓ |
| Walkability | 15✓ | 0 |
| Transit score | 95✓ | 92 |
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: SHANNON, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.