Suburb comparison
FLAGSTAFF GULLY vs TAROONA
TAROONA leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 | TAROONA TAS 7053 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 56 | 58✓ |
| Liveability score | 56 | 73✓ |
| Median price | $835,000✓ | $900,000 |
| Median rent | $400/wk | $425/wk |
| Rental yield | 2.5%✓ | 2.5% |
| Annual growth | 3.0% | 3.2%✓ |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.3%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1017 | 1134✓ |
| Safety index | 48 | 78✓ |
| Walkability | 15✓ | 3 |
| Transit score | 95 | 95 |
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: TAROONA, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.