Suburb comparison
MITCHIDY MOOLA vs WATERFALL GULLY
WATERFALL GULLY leads on more metrics (7 vs 3).
| Metric | MITCHIDY MOOLA SA 5690 | WATERFALL GULLY SA 5066 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 51 | 61✓ |
| Liveability score | 24 | 91✓ |
| Median price | $205,000✓ | $1,975,000 |
| Median rent | $160/wk | $410/wk |
| Rental yield | 4.1%✓ | 1.1% |
| Annual growth | 3.4%✓ | -1.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.8%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 841 | 1168✓ |
| Safety index | 61 | 100✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 85✓ |
| Transit score | 17 | 95✓ |
Full profile: MITCHIDY MOOLA, SA
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: WATERFALL GULLY, SA
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for SA ✓ and SA ✓; rents are real for SA. Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.