Suburb comparison
AMATA vs HUMPTY DOO
HUMPTY DOO leads on more metrics (8 vs 2).
| Metric | AMATA NT 0872 | HUMPTY DOO NT 0836 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 44 | 45✓ |
| Liveability score | 20 | 27✓ |
| Median price | $205,000 | $160,000✓ |
| Median rent | $75/wk | $400/wk |
| Rental yield | 1.9% | 13.0%✓ |
| Annual growth | 1.0%✓ | 0.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.0%✓ | 4.2% |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 627 | 955✓ |
| Safety index | 20 | 21✓ |
| Walkability | 0 | 5✓ |
| Transit score | 25 | 26✓ |
Full profile: AMATA, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: HUMPTY DOO, NT
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for NT (modelled) and NT (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.