Suburb comparison
BATTERY POINT vs FLAGSTAFF GULLY
BATTERY POINT leads on more metrics (6 vs 3).
| Metric | BATTERY POINT TAS 7004 | FLAGSTAFF GULLY TAS 7015 |
|---|---|---|
| Investor score | 50 | 56✓ |
| Liveability score | 77✓ | 56 |
| Median price | $830,000✓ | $835,000 |
| Median rent | $400/wk | $400/wk |
| Rental yield | 2.5%✓ | 2.5% |
| Annual growth | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 1.7%✓ |
| Avg. school ICSEA | 1135✓ | 1017 |
| Safety index | 58✓ | 48 |
| Walkability | 92✓ | 15 |
| Transit score | 67 | 95✓ |
Full profile: BATTERY POINT, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Full profile: FLAGSTAFF GULLY, TAS
50 data fields, schools, map, demographics & risk
Median sale prices are real for TAS (modelled) and TAS (modelled); rents are real for . Other figures may be modelled estimates — see Real/Est. labels on each suburb page. Not financial advice.